ID: | HARP-016 |
Title: | Nahlik v. Austria |
Source: | http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf |
Parties: | Complainants: Franz Nahlik; State Party: Austria |
Dispute Resolution Organ: | UN Human Rights Committee – First optional Protocol to the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights |
Year: | 1996 |
Pages: | 0 |
Author(s): | |
Keywords: | anti-discrimination, Austria, collective bargaining agreement, discrimination, distinction, equality before the law, human rights, retired employees, retirement benefit |
Abstract: | The author of the complaint alleges discrimination entailed in a collective bargaining agreement. Pre-1992 retirees were not to receive the retirement benefit that post-1992 retirees would. They do not get the raise in salary that active employees and post-jan, 1992 retirees would. He states that the different treatment between active and retired employees and between pre-January-1992-retirees and post-January-1992-retirees was not based on reasonable and objective criteria, as the groups of persons concerned find themselves in a comparable situation with regard to their income and they face the very same economic and social conditions. |
Secured: | False |
Download Article: | Available here |
Nahlik v. Austria
Keywords: anti-discrimination, Austria, collective bargaining agreement, discrimination, distinction, equality before the law, human rights, retired employees, retirement benefit