| ID: |
TARP-038 |
| Title: |
Zheng Hong Li Company v. Industrial and Commercial Administrative Bureau, Baoshan District, Shanghai |
| Source: |
Shanghai No.2 Intermediate People’s Court Website |
| Parties: |
Zheng Hong Li Company (plaintiff) v. Industrial and Commercial Administrative Bureau, Baoshan District, Shanghai (defendant) |
| Dispute Resolution Organ: |
People’s Court, Baoshan District, Shanghai (first instance); Shanghai No.2 Intermediate People’s Court (Court of appeal, final decision) |
| Year: |
1998 |
| Pages: |
0 |
| Author(s): |
|
| Keywords: |
administrative penalties, China, dispute resolution, evidence, jurisdiction, profiteering, Shanghai, speculation, tax, transparency |
| Abstract: |
The defendant found that the plaintiff sold to the other company the tax-free goods whose dealing was restricted according to the law. The defendant made a decision of administrative penalties in respect of speculation and profiteering (“decision”) on 10 Sept 1996. The plaintiff objected and applied to the Commercial Administrative Bureau, Shanghai for administrative reconsideration, which maintained the “decision”. The plaintiff sued. |
| Secured: |
False |
| Download Article: |
Available here |
Keywords: administrative penalties, China, dispute resolution, evidence, jurisdiction, profiteering, Shanghai, speculation, tax/tax law, transparency
