Asia Pacific Dispute Resolution
Involving a network of colleagues, this project supports research, analysis and policy proposals on cross-cultural dispute resolution in the areas of trade and human rights, with particular attention to Canada, China, India, Indonesia and Japan.
  • Home
  • Workshops & Conferences
    • Workshops & APDR Meetings
      • 2018 Workshops & Meetings
      • 2017 Workshops & Meetings
      • 2016 Workshops & Meetings
      • 2015 Workshops & Meetings
      • 2014 Workshops & Meetings
      • 2013 Workshops & Meetings
      • 2012 Workshops & Meetings
      • 2011 Workshops & Meetings
      • 2010 Workshops & Meetings
      • 2009 Workshops & Meetings
    • Conferences
      • 2018 Conferences
      • 2017 Conferences
      • 2016 Conferences
      • 2015 Conferences
      • 2014 Conferences
      • 2013 Conferences
      • 2012 Conferences
      • 2011 Conferences
      • 2010 Conferences
      • 2009 Conferences
  • Database
    • Phase I
      • Archival Research Protocol I
        • Keywords
        • Categories
      • Interview Protocol I
    • Phase II
      • Archival Research Protocol II
        • Keywords
        • Categories
  • Archieve Phase I
  • UBC
  • Year one research notes
  • Fischer, Alexander
  • Year Two Research Notes
  • Tracing China’s HIV Epidemic: A Story of Cross-border Geopolitics
  • Ongoing Research Symposium
  • Policy Implications Roundtable
  • Introduction
    • Who We Are
    • About IAR
    • About Allard School of Law
    • About MCRI
    • Biographies
      • Li, Jianyong
      • Machmud, Zakir Sjakur
      • Wang, Haifeng
      • Akira Fujimoto
      • Caihong Jin
      • Suyun Hu
      • Kyoko Ishida
      • Lesley Jacobs
      • Fang Hou
      • Sean Cooney
      • Ashwini Desphande
      • Julian Dierkes
      • Robert Paterson
      • Arianto Patunru
      • Michael Leaf
      • Jianyong Li
      • Yigong Liu
      • Bharat Ramaswami
      • Suryadi Santoso
      • Ljiljana Biukovic
      • Weidong He
      • Xiaorong Gu
      • Yoshitaka Wada
      • Wilima Wadhwa
      • Shuliang Wang
      • Pengfei Yang
      • Fengqi Zhou
      • Ying Zhu
      • Camille Cameron
      • Yasunobu Sato
      • Ashwini Kulkarni
      • Hisham Zerriffi
      • Zhang Yulin (Jerry)
      • Yoshihiko Wada
      • Qiyu Tu
      • Ilan Vertinsky
      • Debra Steger
      • Linda Sulistiawati
      • Takuya Takahashi
      • Bakti (Bobi) Setiawan
      • Hiroo Sono
      • Richard Schwindt
      • Pitman Potter
      • Richard Paisley
      • Masao Nakamura
      • Penelope Nicholson
      • Tim McDaniels
      • Milind Murugkar
      • Xiaoning Li
      • Peimin Lou
      • Abidin Kusno
      • Diana Lary
      • Ashok Kotwal
      • Darrin Lehman
      • Yuka Kaneko
      • Moshe Hirsch
      • Timothy Cheek
      • Sarah Biddulph
      • Richard Barichello
      • Aris Ananta
      • Milind Kandlikar
      • Nisha Malhotra
      • Yi-Ding Hao
    • International Advisory Board
  • About
  • Partners
    • Institutional Partners
    • Research Network
    • Sponsors
    • Academic Community
  • Program
    • Research Groups
      • Country Research Groups
        • Canada
        • China
        • India
        • Indonesia
        • Japan
      • Coordinated Compliance Research Group
    • Program Outline
  • Research Network
  • Contact Us
  • Dissemination
    • China Links
    • Publications
      • APDR Working Papers Series
        • Volume 1: Trade Policy Implications and Development
        • Volume 2: Trade Policy Implications and Good Governance
        • Volume 3: Trade Policy Implications and the Right to Health
        • Volume 4: Trade Policy Implications and the Right to Labour
        • Volume 5: Trade Policy Implications and Poverty/Inequality
      • APDR Publications Inventory
        • Books
        • Book Chapters
        • Journal Articles
        • Media and Other Publications
        • Upcoming Publications
        • APDR-Related Publications
      • APDR Research Notes (RN)
    • Students and Post Doctoral Research Fellows: Dissemination
    • Policy Engagement
Browse: Home / Ecuador

Ecuador

Action for non-compliance filed by the Inter-American Society Game Technology Ltda. against the Republic of Ecuador, for the alleged breach of the articles 4 of the agreement establishing the Court of Justice of the Andean Community; 80 c) of the Cartagena Agreement; 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 26 of Decision 439 of June 11, 1998 from the Commission of the Andean Community; articles 2 numbers 1, 3 and 4; and articles 3 and 4 of the Decision 510 of October 30, 2001 from the Commission of the Andean Community; and the articles XVI y XVII of the AGCS (General Agreement on Trade in Services, GATS), incorporated by reference to the Andean legislation by the mentioned decisions.

By rmate on August 3, 2012

ID: Title: Action for non-compliance filed by the Inter-American Society Game Technology Ltda. against the Republic of Ecuador, for the alleged breach of the articles 4 of the agreement establishing the Court of Justice of the Andean Community; 80 c) of the Cartagena Agreement; 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 and 26 of Decision 439 of […]

Posted in 2008, Archival Research Protocol II | Tagged dispute reports, dispute resolution, Ecuador, human rights, Inter-American Society Game Technology, trade

Action for non-compliance filed by the General Secretariat of the Andean Community against the Republic of Ecuador, for the alleged breach of articles 4 of the Agreement establishing the Court of Justice of the Andean Community, of article 77 of Cartagena Agreement, and the Resolution 897 of the General Secretariat of the Andean Community.

By rmate on August 3, 2012

ID: Title: Action for non-compliance filed by the General Secretariat of the Andean Community against the Republic of Ecuador, for the alleged breach of articles 4 of the Agreement establishing the Court of Justice of the Andean Community, of article 77 of Cartagena Agreement, and the Resolution 897 of the General Secretariat of the Andean […]

Posted in 2009, Archival Research Protocol II | Tagged dispute reports, dispute resolution, Ecuador, human rights, trade

Research Report on ANDEAN COMMUNITY Decisions

By rmate on August 2, 2012

ID: Title: Research Report on ANDEAN COMMUNITY Decisions Source: Review of 67 decisions issued by the Court of Justice of the Andean Community from 2006-2010 (July). Parties: Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and/or Peru. Dispute Resolution Organ: As part of the integration process, the members of the Andean Community created the Court of Justice, which is the […]

Posted in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, Archival Research Protocol II | Tagged Bolivia, Colombia, dispute reports, dispute resolution, Ecuador, international trade, Peru