| ID: |
TARP-146 |
| Title: |
Qiuchang Hongchang Hardware & Plastic Factory v. Shenzhen Custom Agency |
| Source: |
Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court website |
| Parties: |
Qiuchang Hongchang Hardware & Plastic Factory v. Shenzhen Custom Agency |
| Dispute Resolution Organ: |
Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court |
| Year: |
2001 |
| Pages: |
0 |
| Author(s): |
|
| Keywords: |
administrative penalties, China, custom agency, hardware, supervision, transparency |
| Abstract: |
The defendant found that the plaintiff left the bonded goods in another factory without approval so that the bonded goods were not under the supervision of the custom agency. The defendant issued a written decision of administrative penalty on 2 April 2001 to the plaintiff. The plaintiff objected and sued on the basis that the defendant failed to inform the plaintiff of the right to be heard and that the limitation period had been expired. |
| Secured: |
False |
| Download Article: |
Available here |
Keywords: administrative penalties, China, custom agency, hardware, supervision, transparency
