| ID: |
TARP-158 |
| Title: |
National Treatment in Foreign Investment Law: A Comparative Study from a Chinese Perspective |
| Source: |
10 Touro Int’l L. Rev. 39 |
| Parties: |
|
| Dispute Resolution Organ: |
|
| Year: |
2000 |
| Pages: |
0 |
| Author(s): |
Jian Zhou |
| Keywords: |
accountability, China, comparative advantage, FDI, foreign investment, investment, law, legal system, national treatment, planned economy, socialist market economy, transparency, WTO, Confucianism, corruption |
| Abstract: |
FDI is mutually justified by the theory of comparative advantage. “Integrating China into the World Trade Organization will provide China with incentives to create a more favorable legal system for foreign investment, including adopting a more comprehensive national treatment standard.” “China has been reluctant to promise national treatment standard to foreign investment.” There are five factors that are slowing development of the Chinese FDI legal system |
| Secured: |
False |
| Download Article: |
Available here |
Keywords: accountability, China, comparative advantage, Confucianism, corruption, FDI, foreign direct investment/foreign investment, investment, law, legal system, national treatment, planned economy, socialist market economy, transparency, World Trade Organization/WTO
