| ID: |
TARP-033 |
| Title: |
Shanghai Baochang Realty Development Company v Judical Bureau, Yangpu District, Shanghai |
| Source: |
Shanghai No.2 Intermediate People’s Court |
| Parties: |
Shanghai Baochang Realty Development Company (plaintiff) v Judical Bureau, Yangpu District, Shanghai (defendant) |
| Dispute Resolution Organ: |
People’s Court, Yangpu District, Shanghai (first instance); shanghai No.2 Intermediate People’s Court (court of appeal, final dicision) |
| Year: |
1999 |
| Pages: |
0 |
| Author(s): |
|
| Keywords: |
China, jurisdiction, law, notarization, real estate, transparency |
| Abstract: |
On 10 May 1996, the Notarial Office of Yangpu District made a Notarization for Coercive Execution of Obligatory Document (“Notarization”). In May 1997, the plaintiff applied for the cancellation of this “Notarization”. The Notarial Office of Yangpu District made a decision not to cancel the “Notarization”. (“Non-canceling Decision”). The plaintiff brought this claim to the defendant which made a decision to maintain the “Non-canceling Decision” on 23 March 1998. The plaintiff sued. |
| Secured: |
False |
| Download Article: |
TARP-033.doc |
Keywords: China, jurisdiction, law, notarization, real estate, transparency
