| ID: |
HARP-043 |
| Title: |
Injury in working can not be authenticated by outpatient department’s diagnosis |
| Source: |
Xue Zhuan and Zhu Yumin, Chinese Court Website |
| Parties: |
A garment factory vs. Rugao Labor and Social Insurance Bureau |
| Dispute Resolution Organ: |
Rugao Court |
| Year: |
2003 |
| Pages: |
0 |
| Author(s): |
|
| Keywords: |
arbitration, China, employment, human rights, injury, labor dispute, injury in duty |
| Abstract: |
Huang was an employee of a group corporation. He was arranged to work in a garments factory and was hit by some heavy material. He went to the hospital and got an outpatient department’s diagnosis indicating that his bone was broken. Huang asked the garment factory to treat him as injured in working. After being refused, he asked Rugao Labor Dispute Arbitration Committee to authenticate. Rugao Labor and Social Insurance Bureau was appointed to authenticate Huang’s injury. It authenticate that Huang was injured in working. |
| Secured: |
False |
| Download Article: |
Available here |
Keywords: arbitration/arbitrator, China, employment, human rights, injury, injury in duty, labor dispute
