ID: |
HARP-319 |
Title: |
In support of Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act: a comparison of Canadian, British, and American anti-terrorism law |
Source: |
Saskatchewan Law Review , v.66(2) 2003 pg 419-454 |
Parties: |
|
Dispute Resolution Organ: |
|
Year: |
2003 |
Pages: |
0 |
Author(s): |
|
Keywords: |
Canada, culture, democracy, enforcement, human rights, international law, legislation, United Kingdom/Great Britain, US, legal culture, civil and political rights, security, crime, terrorists/terrorism, liberty |
Abstract: |
This article compares Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act to similar British and American legislation, arguing that it is a tempered and positive contribution to the fight against international terrorism. Because terrorism undermines both the values of liberal democracy and international law, an effective legal response requires transnational measures. Accordingly, the shared security concerns and legal culture of Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States establish a broader context in which to consider their respective anti-terrorism measures and promote informal cooperative efforts. The anti-terrorism laws of these three countries similarly define and target terrorist offences, establish special investigatory powers for law enforcement, and attack hate crimes. Examination of these particular statutory provisions suggests that they form complimentary legal frameworks for fighting terrorism, to which Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act is a well-drafted and effective contribution. |
Secured: |
False |
Download Article: |
Available here |
Keywords: Canada, civil and political rights, crime, culture, democracy, enforcement, human rights, international law, legal culture, legislation, liberty, security, terrorists/terrorism, United Kingdom/Great Britain, United States/USA