| ID: |
HARP-113 |
| Title: |
The employee needs not to pay deposits to his employer |
| Source: |
Beijing Labor Protection Website |
| Parties: |
Miss Su vs. An electrical company |
| Dispute Resolution Organ: |
Labor Dispute Arbitration Committee |
| Year: |
2002 |
| Pages: |
0 |
| Author(s): |
|
| Keywords: |
arbitration, China, employment, human rights, labor law, labor dispute, labor contract |
| Abstract: |
Miss Su was charged 600 yuan deposit when she applied for the job at the electrical company. One month after her employment, she found that it is illegal for the employer to charge deposits to its employees. She asked her company to return the depost bus was refused. The company declared that the deposit would be returned only after the labor contract expires. If Miss Su wanted the amout back, she would lose the job. Miss Su applied for arbitration. |
| Secured: |
False |
| Download Article: |
Available here |
Keywords: arbitration/arbitrator, China, employment, human rights, labor contract, labor dispute, labor law
