ID: |
TARP-129 |
Title: |
Medicinal Materials Company of Guangdong Province v. Ministry of Finance of the PRC |
Source: |
State Information Center: State Regulations Database |
Parties: |
Medicinal Materials Company of Guangdong Province v. Ministry of Finance of the PRC |
Dispute Resolution Organ: |
First instance: Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court; Court of appeal (final decision): Superior People’s Court of Guangdong province |
Year: |
2000 |
Pages: |
0 |
Author(s): |
|
Keywords: |
administrative reconsideration, China, evidence, transparency, written decision |
Abstract: |
The Administrative Bureau of State-owned assets of Guangdong Province made an official and written decision, i.e., the “Pi Fu”, that the building at issue belonged to a third party company instead of the plaintiff. The plaintiff objected and applied to the Administrative Bureau of State-owned assets of the PRC for administrative reconsideration, which decided that the Administrative Bureau of State-owned assets of Guangdong Province should make a new decision. The Administrative Bureau of State-owned assets of Guangdong Province reviewed the case and affirmed the original decision. The plaintiff objected and again, applied to the Administrative Bureau of State-owned assets of the PRC for administrative reconsideration. This time, it was decided that the “Pi Fu” at issue should be quashed. Some days later, the defendant made a decision (“decision at issue”) that the decision made by the Administrative Bureau of State-owned assets of the PRC should be disaffirmed. Hence, the building at issue belonged to the third part company. The plaintiff sued. |
Secured: |
False |
Download Article: |
Available here |
Keywords: administrative reconsideration, China, evidence, transparency, written decision